why is the best option from the 164th Alfa Romeo? Fact on 3.0 24v engines that are installed on the 166-th AR, there are no problems with the timing belt tensioner (manual costs)
and drive the oil pump (replaced by the chain). injection system of an older 164 (3 nozzles operate at once) and problem (mechanical flow meter, FW,
terribly deficient rollers and belt tensioner). On new engines a problem - an electronic pedal and throttle. Parts for 156 th, 166 th motors are purchased easily and naturally as opposed to 164.
As for gear ratios, you will not forget that you have 3.0 24v engine and free spins to 7000 rpm, and I have a TS and it is already at the cutoff 6200))) I understand that speed is limited to 100 km, but the city is the speed limit)
Regarding the budget, say so. I have my workhorse Opel Astra 2005 this 9000 $) but its still not going to sell as not to drive what will be. before that I had a 5000 $ on turbo TS project, but plans have changed since my wife and I are waiting for the baby.))
What about spare parts with 75th V6, and some of them can be found in my town, and some parts have to look for. Nevertheless they diffitsit, you did a lot of them?) have regard to parts of the engine Alfa Romeo 75 3.0 V6, this is a big problem. On a whole bunch of TS.
What does it mean to make a cheaper 3.0, 12 or 24c more expensive? the price of these engines have one. The number of alterations that have to do long installation
These engines are also one. what sense then to put a weaker engine when for the same money, you can put a more powerful)))
Yes, friends, and you can show photos of the alterations in the engine compartment that are needed for installation Busso. Thank you)
